First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
—Ann Arbor, Michigan
Even though the original Fit debuted in 2001, we Americans were deprived of the little Honda that could until it finally arrived Stateside in 2006. After years of successful sales in Japan and Europe (where it sold as the Jazz) the folks at Honda decided to see how the diminutive hatchback would do in the bigger-is-better United States auto market. At that time, a gallon of regular unleaded still cost less than three dollars and consumers were lined up for miles waiting for new crossovers and sport-utilities to hit dealer lots. Not even Honda had anticipated that the Fit would sell roughly 80,000 units each year in America.
If this revamped Fit is to continue as the class-leader in a segment that is more important than ever, it must not only trump the outgoing model, it will need to have quality and refinement standards that one-up other small car offerings.
(Click through the post to read the full review.)
The 2009 Fit is offered in three flavors: base, Sport, and Sport Navi (essentially the Sport model with a navigation system and stability control). All models use the same 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine from the outgoing model, although power has been boosted to 117 horsepower (up by eight) and 106 pound-feet of torque (up by one). Ringing in at 2534 pounds, our manual transmission Sport Navi test car rang in at 63 pounds heavier than the previous top-trim Fit Sport, with the minimal boost in power compensating for its extra weight. The new Fit is the same height as the old model, but the wheelbase has been lengthened by two inches (to 98.4), overall length is up by 4.3 inches (to 161.8), and the front and rear tracks have been widened by 0.8 and 0.6 inches respectively. This, combined with larger sixteen-inch alloys on the Sport and Sport Navi give the Fit a more planted feeling on the road and make it noticeably more stable in turns. (The base Fit now benefits from fifteen-inch steel wheels, as opposed to the outgoing model’s fourteen-inchers.)
The adjustments to the Fit’s dimensions also have benefits inside. Cargo volume has swollen to 57.3 cubic feet with the second-row seats folded flat—a gain of 15.4 cubic feet—and additional compartments now reside under the second-row seats, creating safe storage for smaller items. Honda’s lovely Magic Seat system allows the second row to fold with ease, and redesigned rear headrests let the second-row bench fold completely flat—even when the front seats are set as far back as possible. The rear compartment is more passenger-friendly as well, with increased head- and legroom and a modest increase in rear hiproom, too. Overall passenger volume is up nearly one cubic foot, and the thinner pillars and larger windows give the cabin an airy, spacious feeling. Both front and rear seats are more supportive than the outgoing Fit, with better bolstering on the bottom cushions and higher-quality materials, though we still found the front seats to be a bit short for our legs. Nevertheless, sitting in a Fit is more pleasant than in a Toyota Yaris, Scion xD, or Nissan Versa. We do prefer the edgier appearance of the xD’s center stack, but find that the Fit has better stereo and HVAC controls. A major improvement is the addition of a standard telescopic steering wheel, something that other competitors in this segment fail to offer. The steering wheel itself seems to be ripped right out of a CR-V, and its added thickness and small diameter is indeed welcome. One of the biggest compliments we have for the Fit is how wonderful its steering feel is. In fact, this author feels that the Fit’s steering is more responsive and enjoyable than in the new-for-2009 Acura TSX.
The five-speed manual transmission in our test car worked well, and the clutch pedal is easy to modulate, resulting in solid gear engagement. We would prefer shorter shift throws, but we’re sure that there will be plenty of aftermarket options to alleviate such qualms. We also drove a Fit Sport with the five-speed automatic and wheel-mounted paddle shifters—the only five-speed unit in its class. The automatic feels quicker off the line than the manual, and the paddle shifters are surprisingly engaging to use. We prefer the stick-shift setup, however, as it allows you to really make the best use of the Fit’s 117 horses. In an ideal world, we would prefer more low-end torque, as we found ourselves having to downshift more than necessary to have adequate speed while exiting turns on twisty backroads.
During our test, the Fit’s suspension did a good job of softening Michigan’s many potholes while still giving a tight, sporty feel. The Fit uses MacPherson struts up front and a torsion-beam out back, with the Sport models benefitting from a seventeen-millimeter rear stabilizer bar. The Fit’s brake pedal is a bit soft, and it seemed like we needed to push down farther than usual to achieve proper stopping power.
We were able to drive the Fit alongside a Scion xD and found the Honda to be the more enjoyable choice. Even though the xD has more power—128 horses and 125 pound-feet—our test Scion’s four-speed automatic did not adequately manage the engine’s power, and both automatic and manual Fits were more engaging drives. The Honda’s longer wheelbase and lower ground clearance also help it to feel much more attached to the road than the xD, and the superior steering feel make it our choice for spirited, small-car fun. The Fit’s fuel economy numbers fall right in line with that of the xD, too—27 miles per gallon in the city and 33 mpg highway with either transmission. As a bonus, we find the Fit to be among the most aesthetically pleasing cars in its segment. Honda executives say the Fit’s design is “aggressive yet friendly,” and we’d have to agree.
The 2009 Fit hits showrooms in September, with prices starting at $14,550 for a manual-equipped base model (the automatic will cost you $800 more). The Fit Sport will ring in at $16,060, and the Navi will command $17,910 (the five-speed auto adds $850 to the price of a Sport and Sport Navi). Honda is expecting the mid-grade Fit Sport to account for nearly 70 percent of total model sales, and with its class-leading interior refinement and overall fun-to-drive charisma, we don’t see Honda having any trouble moving their anticipated 80,000 Fits per year.
2009 HONDA FIT SPORT NAVI
Engine: Inline-4, 1.5 liters, 16v
Output: 117 hp/106 lb-ft
Weight: 2534 lb
Cargo Capacity: 57.3 cu ft
Fuel Economy, city/hwy: 27/33 mpg
Base Price: $17,910


Comments
SaturnBob
quote: A major improvement is the addition of a standard telescopic steering wheel, something that other competitors in this segment fail to offer. end quote.
Doesn't the Saturn Astra compete in this class? And yes, it has telescopic steering - standard. It also has 138hp to a vehicle with close to the same weight, has OnStar and navigation - standard - and it's German built, all for the same price of the Navi model.
Just something to think about.
Ducati Minor
I don't think so. The Astra is Saturn's standard compact more inline with the VW Rabbit--a size larger.
Like the Fit, and expect this one to be even better. For $15K, this one would get my vote.
videosarg
Once again Honda improves a small car by making it bigger?!? In a few years it will be Accord size and they will have to make a small car to fit under the Fit.
Ziggy
Honda only does re-designs every 5 years and this will never be the size of the accord. I could see it getting a little bigger for it's 2013 model and honda releasing something like a U.S. version of the Zest.
bmwloco
$17k for a fit?!
I'd rather spend $16k on a 2 door VW Rabbit or pony up $1000 more for the 4 door Rabbit and get a lot more car in all respects.
Likely to last a long time too, and safe.
Chris Paukert
I blanched a bit when I saw that figure as well, but after a bit more consideration, I think it's likely a heck of a value. There's a good amount of space in the Fit and great seating flexibility, and at that 17k pricepoint, it's loaded for bear.
By comparison, the base Rabbit is light on standard equipment, and although in certain respects it is probably the more mature driving experience, long-term value, fuel economy, and reliability point squarely in the Honda's favor. Both anecdotally and by the quality surveys, I have a very hard time swallowing the "likely to last a long time too" comment, particularly when put door-to-door with a Fit. As a longstanding VW cheerleader (and former owner), it pains me to say it, but VW reliability--while improving--is still out in the woods somewhere.
Chris Paukert
Editor-In-Chief
Winding Road Magazine // NextAutos
mo
next autos, here is a QoD suggestion.
what is the best car that has sport in its name, but has nothing to do with being sporty?
I donno who wins, the fit sport, or the grand Caravan sport.
BP
Question :What is the value of the Fit after 4 years my bet is higher than any other in its class.
Honda is still the leader in the sub compact class
Steve
Jeeze... This really makes me think... New Fit + New Motorcycle = $25,000... That's a steal! As these small cars keep getting better, our options as consumers will keep getting better and better too! Very exciting!
"There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering; all the rest are merely games.”
- Ernest Hemingway
Anonymous333
-Question :What is the value of the Fit after 4 years my bet is higher than any other in its class.
Honda is still the leader in the sub compact class
The Value might be Higher BP, I see that point. However, studies have shown that the Hyundai Accent is the most relaible subcompact made in this decade. It may not be flashy like the Fit but it gets the job done, like those old school Civics, Golfs, and Corollas used to before they became "Mainstream" cars.
By the SaturnBob, the Astra is a C-segment caat competing with cars such as the Civic. They should have made a Colbalt version for the Astra. Then again, that is just another reason why I do not Drive Garbage Motors Products.
Strange how Honda has lowered the Fuel Econ Figures for this model. The 2009 Accent will be 30/36, Rio 31/38, Yaris will have the same Mileage at 30/36, Ford Fiesta/Escort/Verve (or whatever they are going to call it) is estimated to even have more; possibly 40 MPG, the Aveo has more also. Plus all of those cars cost less, and some such as the Accent are just as relaible if not even more.
I wonder how much MPG will the Fit Hybrid get?
Anonymous
I wonder how much MPG will the Fit Hybrid get?
If it's like our Prius, then our real world experience is around 44 mpg. At 12,000 miles/yr and $4/gal. that will save you $500/yr. If the hybrid costs more than $2K over the regular model, probably not worth it (except for the benefit to your carbon footprint-depends how you value that).
Anonymous333
Saving $500 (probably more in my case) a year on a $15-$16K Hybrid in which I would drive up to 25,000 miles a year on it would be a big savings. I would consider a Hybrid Fit on a Shopping List. I just know that my next Sub-Compact will be a Hybrid: Fit, Accent, or Rio.
JeffDeWitt
How about a 2 door Fit? Even better how about a 2 door Fit Si? Some of the greatest Honda's have been Civic hatchbacks and since the Civic has "grown up" the Fit should be taking it's place.
Post new comment